Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement 2/Workshop
 | By direction of a drafting arbitrator, there will be no workshop in this case. Evidence should be submitted on the evidence page by 10 November 2015. Comments may be made regarding the proposed decision on the proposed decision talk page once it has been posted. |
 | This case is now closed and pages relating to it may no longer be watched
|
Case clerks: Callanecc (Talk) & Liz (Talk) Drafting arbitrator: Salvio giuliano (Talk)
| Wikipedia Arbitration |
|---|
 |
|
|
| Track related changes |
Behaviour on this page: Arbitration case pages exist to assist the Arbitration Committee in arriving at a fair, well-informed decision. You are required to act with appropriate decorum during this case. While grievances must often be aired during a case, you are expected to air them without being rude or hostile, and to respond calmly to allegations against you. Accusations of misbehaviour posted in this case must be proven with clear evidence (and otherwise not made at all). Editors who conduct themselves inappropriately during a case may be sanctioned by an arbitrator, clerk, or functionary, without further warning, by being banned from further participation in the case, or being blocked altogether. Personal attacks against other users, including arbitrators or the clerks, will be met with sanctions. Behavior during a case may also be considered by the committee in arriving at a final decision.
Start a discussion about improving the Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement 2/Workshop page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement 2/Workshop" page.
